This system evaluates biological, environmental, and structural constraints to prevent unsafe or incompatible dog shelter decisions.
No recommendations.
No rankings.
Only eliminations.
Enter your dog’s height and local conditions.
Incompatible shelters are removed automatically.
It exists to stop:
undersized shelters
cold-weather failures
wind instability
ground-contact rot
anatomical restriction
If no product survives the evaluation, the system will say so.
That outcome is intentional.
It exists to stop:
undersized shelters
cold-weather failures
wind instability
ground-contact rot
anatomical restriction
If no product survives the evaluation, the system will say so.
That outcome is intentional.
Size is guessed, not measured
Climate is ignored
Wind exposure is underestimated
Ground contact is overlooked
Behavioral stress is assumed away
These failures don’t show up in product photos.
They show up after purchase, when returns are difficult or impossible.
This system exists to catch those failures before money or risk is committed.
You provide:
dog shoulder height
minimum environmental temperature
wind exposure
ground surface
If inputs are invalid or biologically impossible, the system refuses to proceed.
Each candidate shelter is evaluated against:
thermal limits
anatomical clearance
structural stability
surface interaction
Any violation immediately disqualifies the shelter.
No weighting.
No averaging.
No persuasion.
Each shelter receives one outcome:
❌ INCOMPATIBLE — structural or environmental failure detected
✅ COMPATIBLE — survives all applied constraints
If all shelters fail, the correct answer is none.
It operates on:
physics
biology
material behavior
environmental exposure
Only shelters that survive every applied constraint are displayed as compatible.
Everything else is removed.
These links exist only after compatibility is established.
Important:
commissions do not influence logic
no product can bypass elimination
rejected shelters never link out
If a shelter fails, it fails — regardless of availability, popularity, or price.
guarantee outcomes
replace professional judgment
adapt itself to fit a desired product
override unsafe conditions
If certainty is not possible, the system refuses to provide it.
That refusal is part of the design.
owners placing dogs outdoors in cold or exposed environments
buyers who cannot afford returns
builders seeking dimensional verification
anyone who wants failure eliminated before purchase
aesthetic comparison
bargain hunting
novelty shelters
indoor-only enclosures
No AI
No personalization
No behavioral tracking
No adaptive logic
Given the same inputs, the system will always return the same result.
That property is what makes it trustworthy.
No. It only removes incompatible options based on constraints.
No. It reduces common failure risks, but real-world conditions vary.
Then the correct answer is none. You likely need a different design, higher door clearance, more insulation, or better placement.
No. Commissions do not influence the elimination logic.